Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao The Journal of Immun...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
The Journal of Immunology
Article . 1973 . Peer-reviewed
License: OUP Standard Publication Reuse
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Complement: Optimal Reaction Conditions for Guinea Pig C4

Authors: W D, Linscott;

Complement: Optimal Reaction Conditions for Guinea Pig C4

Abstract

Abstract The efficiency of reactions involving C4 was markedly affected by antibody class, antibody concentration, temperature, ionic strength, SAC1 multiplicity, and SA:SAC1 ratio; C1-binding affinity was an important factor. Invariably, IgG-sensitized cells showed more lysis with a given amount of C4 than cells treated with IgM when other conditions were equal. Optimal reaction times and temperatures for C4 were as follows: a) for IgG-sensitized cells, 1 hr at 0°C if there are 1000 SAC1/cell, 2 hr or more at 0°C for 100 or fewer SAC1/cell; b) for high concentrations of IgM, the same conditions apply as for IgG; for lower concentrations (100 IgM/cell or less, same amount of C1), optimal conditions will vary depending on other factors (1). The above are for limiting amounts of C4. For higher concentrations of C4, times can be shortened somewhat, but the temperatures should not be altered. A further important consideration is that with IgM Ab, a 30 to 40 min preincubation of the EAC1 at 0°C before adding the C4 at 0°C markedly improves EAC14 reactivity in most cases (1). The optimal ionic strength for the above reactions is about 0.035 to 0.04. With IgM antibody, very firmly bound C1 seemed to have a reduced effectiveness in the C4 reaction, as shown by lower lysis for heavily sensitized cells, and by reduced lysis at high vs low SA:SAC1 ratios, at 30°C. This was never the case with IgG. C4 markedly increased the affinity with which C1 was bound to IgM-sensitized cells; half or more of the C1 could be bound so firmly that it failed to transfer at µ = 0.15. This effect was not seen with IgG antibody at the concentrations used, probably because smaller amounts of C4 were involved. C1-binding affinity did not appear to affect the absolute or relative hemolytic efficiencies of rat or guinea pig EDTA-C with either class of antibody.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Ions, Erythrocytes, Sheep, Time Factors, Complement Fixation Tests, Guinea Pigs, Temperature, Complement System Proteins, Hemolysis, Rats, Kinetics, Immunoglobulin M, Immunoglobulin G, Animals, Calcium, Magnesium, Binding Sites, Antibody, Edetic Acid, Protein Binding

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!