Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Nondestructive Evaluation of Composites

Authors: Donald Hagemaier;

Nondestructive Evaluation of Composites

Abstract

Abstract Composite structures have been used in the fabrication of aircraft structures for the past three decades. Most primary aircraft structures are made from carbon epoxy composites while fairing and antenna .ire made from fiberglass and Kevlar composites. This paper describes the application of nondestructive testing (NDT) for both fabrication and in service inspections. In fabrication, all laminate structures receive ultrasonic inspection while honeycomb parts receive additional radiographic inspection. Ultrasonic and bond testing is used to detect voids, porosity, and disbonds. Additionally, these inspections require personnel qualification, approved procedures, built-in reference standards for instrument calibration, and accept reject criteria. To reduce inspection costs, automated inspections are performed.@ Generally, NDT is not required for in-service inspection except for critical areas of primary structure. However, impact damage, disbonds, water intrusion into honeycomb, does occur necessitating the use of NDT to determine the extent of damage prior to repair. Manual NDT methods are used to evaluate small areas of damage while automated ultrasonic methods, electronic shearography, and thermography (infrared) methods are used for large area scanning. Acoustic emission inspection is sometimes used for proof testing or monitoring of pressure vessels. Introduction The inspection of composite structures is a complex task which requires considerable skill. To ensure inspections are conducted with maximum effectiveness, consistency and reliability, it is necessary that the inspector be equipped with a certain level of knowledge and have access to proper inspection equipment. It is imperative that inspectors have a good understanding of the basic fabrication and repair techniques as well as specific knowledge of the part under inspection. Additionally, inspectors must be familiar with the capabilities and limitations of the various NDT methods. Preproduction Tests This phase includes first-article manufacturing and testing, specification preparation, design and reliability review and supplier selection. During this phase, good communication is needed among the design, stress, materials and process, and NDT engineers. As the R&D hardware and test specimens are fabricated, they are inspected by a variety of applicable NDT methods. As a result of these inspections, quality acceptance standards are established for the production parts. The qualitative and quantitative influence of flaws and property variability are determined. By screening the incoming materials or parts, it is possible to classify them into various quality groupings. Correlation of the destructive and NDT test results enable engineering to make sound judgments for fabrication. Fabrication Inspection The fabrication phase includes material and process control, supplier surveillance, product improvement, increased production output, and cost reduction. Materials and parts are inspected for conformity and systems or components are tested for reliability and quality assurance. The inspection standard requires that the parts be inspected to a detailed inspection plan and that the inspections be carried out by qualified and approved inspection personnel and laboratories. Manufacturing Flaws.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!