
doi: 10.4043/32251-ms
Abstract The engineering assessment in this paper provides the recommendations for the minimum wall thickness selection of marine riser pipeline and their ability to allow the passage of in-line instrument scraper. The assessment was conducted considering two criteria: First, the minimum wall thickness for riser is evaluated against the minimum bore required by in-line instrument scraper provided by several service contractors for in-line inspection. Second, the riser minimum wall thickness is benchmarked with the minimum acceptable wall thickness specified by DNVOS-F101 [1] and Saudi Aramco engineering standard for submarine pipeline design. The outcome of this analysis is the following recommendation: The minimum wall thickness selected for riser pipeline diameters less than 8″ shall not be less than the values tabulated in Table 1 for each service. These values ensure that adequate protection measures are considered during the design of pipeline which is in-line with the requirement of DNV-OS-F101. In addition, the outcome of the assessment results into a collective projected cost avoidance of $ 0.94M per meter of pipeline and reduces carbon foot print.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
