Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Advanced Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Efficient Electrofacies Classification of a Carbonate Reservoir in a Giant Southern Iraqi Oil Field

Authors: Watheq J Al-Mudhafar;

Advanced Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Efficient Electrofacies Classification of a Carbonate Reservoir in a Giant Southern Iraqi Oil Field

Abstract

Abstract Understanding the vertical discrete electrofacies distributions in wells is a vital step to preserve the reservoir heterogeneity. Predicting the electrofacies distribution at all wells is commonly conducted manually or with the use of some graphing approaches, but recently different machine learning techniques have been adopted to categorize electrofacies. In this paper, two supervised machine-learning techniques were implemented to model electrofacies given well logging data for a well in order to predict the distributions in all other wells (classification) in a carbonate reservoir in a giant southern Iraqi Oil Field. The available data included open-hole and CPI well logging records in addition to the routine core analysis. The well discrete electrofacies distribution for the entire reservoir thickness has been obtained in our paper [OTC-29269-MS] using the Ward Hierarchical Clustering Analysis. For electrofacies classification, two supervised machine-learning techniques, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and Random Forests (RF), were adopted to model the resulting electrofacies given the CPI well logging data for a well to predict at other wells that have missing data. These two supervised learning techniques were implemented as non-linear and non-parametric classifiers, which are imperative attribute due to the non-linearity of the electrofacies properties and the geological reservoir control. The results of this research illustrated that the reservoir electrofacies can be predicted through the use of the supervised learning techniques when well logging records and core data are available. The two adopted classification algorithms were analyzed and compared based on confusion table, transition probability matrix and total percent correct (TCP) of the identified electrofacies that reveal the accuracy of the classification. RF was observed to be the optimum approach as it led to better electrofacies classification in this carbonate reservoir than the KNN. The application of supervised machine learning techniques enhanced the accuracy and reduced the time spent in electrofacies classification. The two machine learning algorithms were implemented by R software, the most powerful statistical programming language.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!