
pmid: 21033303
The objective of this study was to determine the association of crown-rump length (CRL) discrepancy in monochorionic and dichorionic twins with subsequent pregnancy outcomes.A retrospective analytical study was performed among 660 twin pregnancies over 12 years in one fetal medicine tertiary referral center in the United Kingdom. A literature search was performed to identify all reports in the English language literature in this topic between 1998 and 2009.Five hundred and six dichorionic and 154 monochorionic twin pregnancies were studied. Median percentage CRL discordance in monochorionic and dichorionic pregnancies was not different (3.9 +/- 8.34, range 0-59 and 3.2 +/- 5.65 range 0-37.5, respectively, p = 0.225). Single or double fetal loss was higher in monochorionic twins than the dichorionic twins. Loss rate was 17.53% (27) and 3.95% (20) respectively (p = < .0001). CRL disparity and birth weight discordancy showed statistically significant correlation (Spearman's rho, p = 0.040). Statistically significant correlation was seen between percentage CRL disparity and pregnancy loss rate (p = 0.008). However, the sensitivity of this CRL discrepancy to detect subsequent fetal loss or birth weight discordance is poor.CRL discrepancy is independent of chorionicity in twins. CRL discrepancy is correlated to subsequent pregnancy loss and birth weight discordance, but the clinical utility of this observation is limited. The difference in twin CRL at 11-14 weeks is likely to represent physiological variation in a majority of cases.
Chi-Square Distribution, Fetal Growth Retardation, Pregnancy Outcome, Twins, Crown-Rump Length, Statistics, Nonparametric, United Kingdom, ROC Curve, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Pregnancy, Multiple, Fetal Death, Retrospective Studies
Chi-Square Distribution, Fetal Growth Retardation, Pregnancy Outcome, Twins, Crown-Rump Length, Statistics, Nonparametric, United Kingdom, ROC Curve, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Pregnancy, Multiple, Fetal Death, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
