Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Revista Brasileira d...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Revista Brasileira de Ciências da Saúde
Article . 2013 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Estudo Comparativo entre Eletrogoniometria e Fotogrametria Digital

Authors: TMM SOUZA; JCN NÓBREGA JÚNIOR; DA RODRIGUES; LC CARVALHO; HH SANTOS; JF ALENCAR; JJA FERREIRA;

Estudo Comparativo entre Eletrogoniometria e Fotogrametria Digital

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the digital photogrammetry replicability compared to electrogoniometry on the elbow flexion movement. Material and Methods: The sample was composed by 20 healthy and active subjects (8 men and 12 women; 20.1 ± 1.7 years; 60.9 ± 9.3 kg and 169.0 ± 8.8 cm), submitted to electrogoniometry and digital photogrammetry. The subjects were in sitting position with the right arm resting on a table; the shoulder was flexed at 90 degrees with a supinated forearm. The elbow flexion angle was measured with and without fixing the electrogoniometer in three different positions (closed, intermediate, open) randomly, using a manual goniometer (CARCI) adapted with a linear potentiometer and a digital camera (Sony, DSC-S750), and subsequently processed in the Biomed and Fisio Office softwares, respectively. Data were analyzed on the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS – 15.0) using the intra-class correlation (ICC) test to evaluate the reproducibility of the electrogoniometry and photogrammetry measures, inter-evaluators and inter-instruments. Results: It was observed a strong reproducibility of the electrogoniometry and photogrammetry for all measures, inter-evaluators (ICC>0.85; P 0.93; P<0.01). Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the digital photogrammetry has high levels of reliability, both inter-evaluators and inter-instruments and thus can be used for physical therapy practice. DESCRIPTORS Goniometry. Photogrammetry. Range of Motion, Articular.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold
Related to Research communities