
Serializability is too strict a correctness criterion for several application domains, in particular where support for long-lasting transactions is required. This paper describes a generalized version of serializability called conditional conflict serializability (CCSR), which is built on a customized notion of conflict rather than the standard commutativity-based one. The actual customization of conflicts is carried out by applications that associate parameters with their read and write operations. The semantics of such parameters are user-defined, and can be chosen to suit various needs. CCSR can be enforced by means of two phase locking with parameterized locks. Transaction histories that are strict or rigorous modulo CCSR are defined, showing that a CCSR scheduler need not rely on compensating actions for recovery.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
