
doi: 10.4018/ijwsr.402014
Clickbait headlines undermine trust in digital journalism by exploiting readers' emotions rather than delivering substantive information. Prior research has largely focused on coarse sentiment polarity, leaving the role of fine-grained emotions underexplored. This study proposes a multi-stage artificial intelligence framework that incorporates RoBERTa-based emotion classification, Spearman correlation analysis, topic modeling, and association rule mining to analyze the clickbait data. Findings from the framework reveal that surprise is the strongest positive correlation of clickbait severity, while sadness, anger, and fear are negatively associated. Also, high-severity clickbait relies on isolated surprise, whereas legitimate news often combines surprise with a neutral tone. These results define an emotional fingerprint of clickbait, offering new theoretical insights into emotional persuasion and practical guidance for news recommendation systems and content governance on social platforms.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
