
doi: 10.4018/ijisp.310069
handle: 2158/1398832
The increase of internet usage in recent times has been a noticeable change in this generation. Users from all over the world use social sites to interact across the world. Countless websites are present today. With countless networks and sites, some people or companies tend to create new ways to lure out the random users using the web, such as phishing. In phishing, the normal users are swindled to use the fraudulent websites. The aim is to identify the phishing websites with great accuracy and compare different methods by which phishing websites can be tracked in an easier and more accurate way. Comparative studies of various algorithms are tested with the help of 10,000 datasets, each tested with 18 different parameters to increase the accuracy score of each algorithm. The paper shows the methods used for phishing detection are more accurate than other practices done so far using certain appropriate parameters and more useful.
Fake Website; Machine Learning; Phishing
Fake Website; Machine Learning; Phishing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
