Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
https://doi.org/10.4...arrow_drop_down
https://doi.org/10.4018/978159...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2011 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2008 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.4018/978159...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2011 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2006 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2011 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2009 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 6 versions
addClaim

Understanding Organizational Memory

Authors: Jasimuddin, Sajjad M.; Connell, Con; Klein, Jonathan H.;

Understanding Organizational Memory

Abstract

It is generally recognized that Walsh and Ungson (1991) “provided the first integrative framework for thinking about organizational memory” (Olivera, 2000, p. 813). Within the field of knowledge management (KM), there has been interest in a variety of issues surrounding organizational memory (OM), which is understood to involve processes of storage and retrieval of organizational knowledge of the past for use in both the present and the future. The recognition of the importance of OM has implications for practice. For example, Argote, Beckman, and Epple (1990) suggest that the effective use of OM can protect an organization from some of the negative effects of staff loss, while Stein (1995, p. 19) asserts that an appreciation of OM can facilitate the solution of problems associated with the retention and utilization of knowledge within organizations.

Country
United Kingdom
Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!