
In this article, I examine whether information ethics is culture relative. If it is, different approaches to information ethics are required in different cultures and societies. This would have major implications for the current, predominantly Western approach to information ethics. If it is not, there must be concepts and principles of information ethics that have universal validity. What would they be? The descriptive evidence is for the cultural relativity of information ethics will be studied by examining cultural differences between ethical attitudes towards privacy, freedom of information, and intellectual property rights in Western and non-Western cultures. I then analyze what the implications of these findings are for the metaethical question of whether moral claims must be justified differently in different cultures. Finally, I evaluate what the implications are for the practice of information ethics in a cross-cultural context.
SDG 16 - Peace, privacy cultural imperialism, computers and society, global village, IR-77237, cultural pluralism, IR-77239, information ethics, cultural values, computing in developing countries, intellectual property rights, social norms, METIS-259825, IR-77240, IR-77241, civil rights, IR-77245, SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities, Justice and Strong Institutions, METIS-244411, Cultural Differences, social issues
SDG 16 - Peace, privacy cultural imperialism, computers and society, global village, IR-77237, cultural pluralism, IR-77239, information ethics, cultural values, computing in developing countries, intellectual property rights, social norms, METIS-259825, IR-77240, IR-77241, civil rights, IR-77245, SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities, Justice and Strong Institutions, METIS-244411, Cultural Differences, social issues
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
