Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
https://doi.org/10.4...arrow_drop_down
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2009 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2010 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2006 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.4018/978159...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2011 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.4018/978160...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2011 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Evaluation of Health Information Systems

Challenges and Approaches
Authors: Elske Ammenwerth; Stefan Gräber; Thomas Bürkle; Carola Iller;

Evaluation of Health Information Systems

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the problems and challenges which occur when health information systems are evaluated. The main problem areas presented are the complexity of the evaluation object, the complexity of an evaluation project, and the motivation for evaluation. Based on the analysis of those problem areas, the chapter then presents recommendations how to address them. In particularly, it discusses in more detail what benefits can be obtained from applying triangulation in evaluation studies. Based on the example of the evaluation of a nursing documentation system, it shows how both the validation of results and the completeness of results can be supported by triangulation. The authors hope to contribute to a better understanding of the peculiarities of evaluation.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?