
doi: 10.4012/dmj.21.285
pmid: 12608418
This study evaluated fluoride-release and recharging with the fluoride mouth rinsing technique on fluoridated materials. Three fluoride containing materials and one non-fluoride containing composite resin were used for this study. Samples for each material consisted of 15 discs, 9 mm diameter with a thickness of 1 mm. Initial fluoride release was assessed over a 60-day period. After that, 15 discs for each material were divided into 3 groups: distilled water group, 450-ppm and 900-ppm mouth rinsing groups. Fluoride release increased in combination with fluoride mouth rinse, and fluoride was higher in the 900-ppm group than the 450-ppm group. Moreover, S-PRG or F-PRG fillers materials released fluoride in higher than fluoroaluminosilicate glass fillers materials. In addition fluoride release from control samples was not observed. Therefore, only fluoride release material takes up fluoride. The findings of the present investigation suggest that the rate of fluoride release was different for each material, because they contained different function fillers. The results showed the importance of the fluoride mouth rinsing technique for fluoride-releasing restorative materials for the prevention of secondary caries.
Analysis of Variance, Statistics as Topic, Mouthwashes, Dental Caries, Esthetics, Dental, Composite Resins, Cariostatic Agents, Resin Cements, Diffusion, Dental Materials, Fluorides, Resins, Synthetic, Glass Ionomer Cements, Materials Testing, Humans, Methacrylates, Aluminum Silicates, Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate, Adsorption, Glass
Analysis of Variance, Statistics as Topic, Mouthwashes, Dental Caries, Esthetics, Dental, Composite Resins, Cariostatic Agents, Resin Cements, Diffusion, Dental Materials, Fluorides, Resins, Synthetic, Glass Ionomer Cements, Materials Testing, Humans, Methacrylates, Aluminum Silicates, Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate, Adsorption, Glass
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 82 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
