
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2009-040
pmid: 20379031
Previously, we reported that the integrity of a resin composite restoration deteriorated when the dentin cavity wall was decalcified by conditioning. In this study, to evaluate the bonding between dentin adhesive and non-decalcified dentin surface, we experimented with a novel method of using a high-pressure water spray device to prepare smear layer-free dentin surfaces. When the smear layer was removed, shear bond strength significantly increased regardless of the removal method employed. Further, with glyceryl monomethacrylate (GM) priming, no significant differences in bond strength were observed among these smear layer removal methods: ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) conditioning, phosphoric acid conditioning, and removal by water spray. It was also found that GM priming was key to achieving marginal integrity, whereas contraction gap width increased with phosphoric acid conditioning. It was thus concluded that the efficacy of a dentin adhesive should be evaluated by consistently observing the contraction gap in three-dimensional cavities rather than by mere measurement of bond strength to a flat dentin surface.
Dental Stress Analysis, Shear bond strength, Dental Bonding, Dental Marginal Adaptation, Composite Resins, Glycerides, Resin Cements, Acid Etching, Dental, Dentin-Bonding Agents, Smear Layer, Dentin, Materials Testing, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Pressure, Humans, Methacrylates, GM priming, Phosphoric Acids, Stress, Mechanical, Dentin adhesive, Shear Strength, Edetic Acid, Chelating Agents
Dental Stress Analysis, Shear bond strength, Dental Bonding, Dental Marginal Adaptation, Composite Resins, Glycerides, Resin Cements, Acid Etching, Dental, Dentin-Bonding Agents, Smear Layer, Dentin, Materials Testing, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Pressure, Humans, Methacrylates, GM priming, Phosphoric Acids, Stress, Mechanical, Dentin adhesive, Shear Strength, Edetic Acid, Chelating Agents
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
