
doi: 10.4000/variants.293
handle: 10067/1445300151162165141 , 20.500.13089/5nu
This essay proposes a model of genetic criticism's complex research object (writing processes) to make it manageable and develop an editorial infrastructure that facilitates research into five aspects of genetic criticism: exogenesis, endogenesis, epigenesis, microgenesis and macrogenesis. It argues that the digital paradigm can be instrumental in a rapprochement between textual scholarship and genetic criticism.
revision, variant, genetic criticism, Literature, scholarly editing, editorial traditions, drafts, genetic edition, digital edition
revision, variant, genetic criticism, Literature, scholarly editing, editorial traditions, drafts, genetic edition, digital edition
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
