
doi: 10.4000/revus.1137
handle: 20.500.13089/k0it
Predsednica Ustavnega sodisca Srbije in predsednica srbskega Drustva za ustavno pravo, prof. dr. Bosa Nenadic v svojem clanku prikazje ustavni položaj, pristojosti in vlogo Ustavnega sodisca Republike Srbije, ki se uvrsca med ustavna sodisca z najsirsimi pristojnostmi. To sodisce ima dolgoletne izkusnje pri uresnicevanju ustavnosodne kontrole ustavnosti, medtem ko je na podrocju varstva clovekovih pravic na podlagi ustavnih pritožb se bolj na zacetku poti. Avtorica kriticno prikazuje in analizira tudi specificen mesani model volitev in imenovanja ustavnih sodnikov, ki vodi do nehomogene sestave sodisca. Avtorica na zgoscen nacin prikazuje veljavno ureditev v Ustavi in ustavnosodno razlago njenih dolocb. Clanek objavljamo v srbskem izvirniku.
election of Constitutional Court judges, Constitutional Court, ustavna pritožba, judicial review, Srbija, Ustavno sodišče, Serbia, constitutional complaint, ustavnosodna kontrola predpisov, volitve ustavnih sodnikov
election of Constitutional Court judges, Constitutional Court, ustavna pritožba, judicial review, Srbija, Ustavno sodišče, Serbia, constitutional complaint, ustavnosodna kontrola predpisov, volitve ustavnih sodnikov
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
