
doi: 10.4000/qds.862
The article offers evidences for the hypothesis that Ortega y Gasset can be considered for all practical purposes as a sociologist, despite the fact that he has been generally viewed as a philosopher. Several arguments of his works show his contribution to the political sociology, the sociology of culture, and the sociological analysis of masses, as well as to a theory of action, where his most important sources are Durkheim and Weber. In arguing for this characterization of Ortega y Gasset, the article does not focus on his best known book, La Rebelion de las Masas. Rather, It takes into account three aspects, which are crucial for revealing such a sociological profile: his methodological perspective, based on the Neo-Kantianism (especially Simmel), his theory of action and, finally, the relationship between individual and society as it is discussed in his works.
Sociology (General), HM401-1281
Sociology (General), HM401-1281
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
