<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.4000/ceroart.1110
handle: 20.500.13089/ds4a
This article is based on the thesis „Icon Forgery. A historical, ethical and technological reflection” by the author, which explains, when is an Icon genuine or a forgery. In doing so, the terms Icon and Icon-copy will be defined by taking the aspects of the religious significance as well as the historical development into consideration. Within the given frame only a few phenomena will be described. Detailed explanations can be found in the complete thesis.
contrefaçon, copie, falsification, Fine Arts, Icon, Arts in general, forgery, N, Icon-copy, NX1-820, icône
contrefaçon, copie, falsification, Fine Arts, Icon, Arts in general, forgery, N, Icon-copy, NX1-820, icône
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |