Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Cahiers de praxémati...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Cahiers de praxématique
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Locative inversion and the surprise effect

When word order interacts with Common Ground
Authors: Andreas Kehl; Amelie Rüeck; Birgit Rapp; Sam Featherston; Susanne Winkler;

Locative inversion and the surprise effect

Abstract

This paper investigates locative inversion (LI) in English from three angles: (i) what are the contextual licensing requirements for this non-canonical word order, (ii) can LI license reflexive anaphors that are unbound in this construction, and (iii) does the presence of LI increase the level of surprise for the addressee? We examine the distribution of given and new information in LI with an introducing context and use different types of subjects to probe first into how natural informants find this information and second whether this increases how surprising informants find this information. We report on two experimental studies, one focusing on the contextual licensing requirements for LI, and one focusing on whether a surprise effect is more connected to linear order or expectations that are linked to the informants’ Common Ground (CG).

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold