Comparing CB-SEM and PLS-SEM results: an empirical example

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Conference object , Other literature type 01 Jan 2015 Spain Publisher:University of TwenteJournal:Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: The conference for PLS Users

Authors: Amaro, Suzanne; Abrantes, José Luís; Seabra, Cláudia;

doi: 10.3990/2.357

handle: 11441/54861

Comparing CB-SEM and PLS-SEM results: an empirical example

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Many scholars view PLS-SEM as less rigorous than CB-SEM, namely due to is less restrictive assumptions. The main objective of this research is to compare the results of both approaches, for a given model, to examine if there are, indeed, noteworthy differences. The study shows that the results obtained in both approaches are very similar. These findings provide useful insights to researchers.

Country

Spain

Related Organizations

University of Seville
Spain
Polytechnic Institute of Viseu
Portugal

Keywords

PLS-SEM, CB-SEM, Involvement

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	7
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average