
doi: 10.3989/ajbm.624
The internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) of the ribosomal cistron, functioning as a mini barcode, has proven successful in numerous angiosperm DNA barcoding studies. However, its efficiency has not been thoroughly questioned in the existing literature. This review statistically evaluates 197 angiosperm DNA barcoding studies that utilized the ITS2 mini barcode. The assessment encompasses not only the ease of amplification, sequencing, and species identification success of the ITS2 region but also a comparison with ITS1, the entire ITS region, matK, and trnH-psbA. The results align with the previous conclusion that ITS2 can be effectively utilized for angiosperm identification. While the amplification, sequencing, and identification to the genus level of the ITS2 region were high, the success in species identification was not as prominent. No significant differences were observed among the types of material or the primer pairs used in terms of the success of the region. The utilization of only the ITS2 region performed well in comparison to DNA barcode combinations. However, it is noteworthy that none of the reviewed regions can be considered a universal barcode for angiosperms. The results suggest that the ITS1 and ITS2 are equally effective as mini-DNA barcodes, followed by the entire ITS region, while matK and trnH-psbA should not be the primary choices.
código de barras de ADN, Angiosperms, ribosomal cistron, ITS1, ITS2, DNA barcoding, internal transcribed spacers, Angiospermas, espaciadores internos transcritos, cistrón ribosómico
código de barras de ADN, Angiosperms, ribosomal cistron, ITS1, ITS2, DNA barcoding, internal transcribed spacers, Angiospermas, espaciadores internos transcritos, cistrón ribosómico
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
