
doi: 10.3982/ecta9409
Summary: We consider the estimation of dynamic panel data models in the presence of incidental parameters in both dimensions: individual fixed-effects and time fixed-effects, as well as incidental parameters in the variances. We adopt the factor analytical approach by estimating the sample variance of individual effects rather than the effects themselves. In the presence of cross-sectional heteroskedasticity, the factor method estimates the average of the cross-sectional variances instead of the individual variances. The method thereby eliminates the incidental-parameter problem in the means and in the variances over the cross-sectional dimension. We further show that estimating the time effects and heteroskedasticities in the time dimension does not lead to the incidental-parameter bias even when \(T\) and \(N\) are comparable. Moreover, efficient and robust estimation is obtained by jointly estimating heteroskedasticities.
incidental parameters in variances, efficiency, Estimation in multivariate analysis, incidental parameters in means, robust estimation, Factor analysis and principal components; correspondence analysis, fixed-\(T\) and large-\(T\) dynamic panels, heteroskedasticity
incidental parameters in variances, efficiency, Estimation in multivariate analysis, incidental parameters in means, robust estimation, Factor analysis and principal components; correspondence analysis, fixed-\(T\) and large-\(T\) dynamic panels, heteroskedasticity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 61 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
