
doi: 10.3982/ecta9183
Summary: Different people use language in different ways. We capture this by making language competence -- the set of messages an agent can use and understand -- private information. Our primary focus is on common-interest games. Communication generally remains possible; it may be severely impaired even with common knowledge that language competence is adequate; and, indeterminacy of meaning, the confounding of payoff-relevant information with information about language competence, is optimal.
communication games, organizational codes, Applications of game theory, Linguistics, indeterminate meaning, Signaling and communication in game theory, language differences
communication games, organizational codes, Applications of game theory, Linguistics, indeterminate meaning, Signaling and communication in game theory, language differences
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 38 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
