Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Acta Orthopaedica et...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica
Article
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Comparison of plateletrich plasma and steroid injection in the treatment of plantar fasciitis

Authors: Say, Ferhat; Gurler, Deniz; Inkaya, Erkan; Bulbul, Murat;

Comparison of plateletrich plasma and steroid injection in the treatment of plantar fasciitis

Abstract

Abstract Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and steroid injections in patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis. Methods: A total of 50 patients with chronic plantar fasciitis were included in the study and divided into 2 groups. In the PRP group (n=25), PRP taken from the patients’ blood was activated using calcium chloride and injected in a single dose. In the steroid group (n=25), a single dose methylprednisolone with local anesthetic injection was given. Clinical evaluation was made using the American Foot and Ankle Score (AFAS) and the visual analog scale (VAS). Results: No complications were seen in any patients. Mean AFAS was 85.5±4.2 at 6 weeks and 90.6±2.6 at 6 months in the PRP group and 75.3±4.8 and 80.3±4.7, respectively, in the steroid group (p<0.001). The difference in the mean VAS between the PRP group (2.4±0.8 and 1±0.8) and the steroid group (4±1.1 and 2.6±0.9) at the 6th week and 6th month was statistically significant (p<0.001). Changes in AFAS and VAS scores were significantly higher in the PRP group (p<0.001). Conclusion: The application of PRP appears to be more effective than steroid injection in terms of pain and functional results in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis. Özet Amaç: Bu çalışmada plantar fasiit tanısı konulan hastalarda trombositten zengin plazma (TZP) ve steroid enjeksiyonunun etkilerinin karşılaştırılması amaçlanmaktadır. Çalışma planı: Kronik plantar fasiit tanısı konan 50 hasta 2 gruba ayrıldı. TZP grubundaki hastaların (n=25) kanlarından hazırlanan TZP kalsiyum klorür ile aktive edilerek, tek doz enjeksiyon uygulandı. Steroid grubundaki hastalara (n=25), tek doz metilprednizolon lokal anestezik ile beraber uygulandı. Klinik değerlendirmede Amerikan Ayak ve Ayak Bileği Skoru (AAAS) ve görsel ağrı skalası (GAS) kullanıldı. Bulgular: Hastaların hiçbirinde komplikasyon görülmedi. TZP grubunda 6. hafta ortalama AAAS skoru 85.5±4.2 ve 6. ay skoru 90.6±2.6; steroid grubunda ise, sırasıyla, 75.3±4.8 ve 80.3±4.7 bulundu (p<0.001). Altıncı hafta ve 6. ay sonunda TZP grubunun ortalama GAS skoru (2.4±0.8 ve 1±0.8) steroid grubundan (4±1.1 ve 2.6±0.9) istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede farklı idi (p<0.001). TZP grubunun AAAS ve GAS skorlarındaki değişimin steroid grubuna kıyasla anlamlı şekilde yüksek olduğu kaydedildi (p<0.001). Çıkarımlar: Kronik plantar fasiit tedavisinde TZP uygulaması steroid enjeksiyonuna göre ağrı ve fonksiyonel sonuçlar üzerinde daha etkili bir yöntemdir.

Country
Turkey
Keywords

Adult, Male, Injections, Intralesional, Methylprednisolone, Risk Assessment, Severity of Illness Index, Statistics, Nonparametric, Humans, Prospective Studies, Steroid, Pain Measurement, Platelet-Rich Plasma, Growth Factor, steroid, platelet-rich plasma, Growth factor, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Fasciitis, Plantar, Plantar Fasciitis, Chronic Disease, Female, plantar fasciitis, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    49
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 4
  • 4
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
49
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 1%
4
Green
gold