Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Acta Orthopaedica et...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica
Article
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Coracoid versus lateral sagittal infraclavicular block

Authors: Toker, Kamil; Solak, Mine; Acar, Sertan; Gurkan, Yavuz;

Coracoid versus lateral sagittal infraclavicular block

Abstract

Abstract Objective: The aim of this study was to compare block performance time and secondarily success rates of coracoid block (CB) and lateral sagittal infraclavicular block (LSIB). \r\nMethods: This prospective study included 100 adult patients scheduled for upper limb surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either a CB or LSIB. A local anesthetic mixture of 20 ml of levobupivacaine 5 mg/ml and 20 ml of lidocaine 20 mg/ml with 5 µg/ml epinephrine (total 40 ml) was administered after obtaining either a median, ulnar or radial nerve type response. Sensory block was tested at 10-minute intervals for 40 min. \r\nResults: Block performance time (CB Group: 5.2±1.9 min, LSIB Group: 5.5±1.4 min) and block success rate (CB Group: 86%, LSIB Group: 92%) were similar in both groups. In the LSIB group, sensory block of the ulnar nerve at 10, 20 and 30 minutes and at the radial nerve at 20 minutes was significantly more intense than the CB group (p<0.05). There were four vascular punctures in the LSIB group. \r\nConclusion: Both block techniques were effective and performed in a similar time period. Özet Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı korakoid blok (coracoid block, CB) ve lateral sagital infraklavikular blok (lateral sagittal infraclavicular block, LSIB) tekniklerinde blok uygulama sürelerini karşılaştırmak ve CB ile LSIB in başarı oranlarını karşılaştırmaktı.\r\nÇalışma planı: Prospektif çalışma yöntemiyle; üst ekstremite ameliyatı tarihi verilen 100 yetişkin hasta rastgele bir biçimde CB ya da LSIB gruplarına ayrıldı. 5 mg/ml oranında 20 ml levobupivakain ve 20 mg/ml oranında 20 ml lidokain ile 5 µg/ml epinefrin içeren lokal anestezik karışımı (toplamı 40 ml); medyan, ulnar ya da radyal sinir tipi yanıtlardan biri alındıktan sonra uygulandı. Duyusal blok 40 dakika boyunca 10 dakikalık aralıklarla test edildi.\r\nBulgular: Blok uygulama süreleri (CB Grubu: 5.2±1.9 dk, LSIB Grubu: 5.5±1.4 dk) ve blok başarı oranları (CB Grubu: %86, LSIB Grubu: %92) her iki grupta da benzerlik göstermekteydi. LSIB grubunda ulnar sinir duyusal blok 10, 20 ve 30. dakikalarda, radyal sinir ise 20. dakikada CB’den anlamlı şekilde daha yoğundu (p<0.05). LSIB grubunda dört adet vasküler ponksiyon saptandı.\r\nÇıkarımlar: Her iki tekniğin de klinik anlamda etkili olduğu ve benzer sürelerde uygulandığı görüldü.

Country
Turkey
Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Double-Blind Method, Monitoring, Intraoperative, Arm, Humans, Female, Nerve Block, Neuromuscular Monitoring, Middle Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
gold