
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021352
pmid: 34814241
<abstract> <p>This paper introduces an improved hybrid Aquila Optimizer (AO) and Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO) algorithm, namely IHAOHHO, to enhance the searching performance for global optimization problems. In the IHAOHHO, valuable exploration and exploitation capabilities of AO and HHO are retained firstly, and then representative-based hunting (RH) and opposition-based learning (OBL) strategies are added in the exploration and exploitation phases to effectively improve the diversity of search space and local optima avoidance capability of the algorithm, respectively. To verify the optimization performance and the practicability, the proposed algorithm is comprehensively analyzed on standard and CEC2017 benchmark functions and three engineering design problems. The experimental results show that the proposed IHAOHHO has more superior global search performance and faster convergence speed compared to the basic AO and HHO and selected state-of-the-art meta-heuristic algorithms.</p> </abstract>
Harris Hawks optimization, Aquila optimizer, hybrid algorithm, harris hawks optimization, Nonconvex programming, global optimization, Approximation methods and heuristics in mathematical programming, aquila optimizer, Machine Learning, representative-based hunting, QA1-939, Heuristics, opposition-based learning, TP248.13-248.65, Mathematics, Algorithms, Biotechnology
Harris Hawks optimization, Aquila optimizer, hybrid algorithm, harris hawks optimization, Nonconvex programming, global optimization, Approximation methods and heuristics in mathematical programming, aquila optimizer, Machine Learning, representative-based hunting, QA1-939, Heuristics, opposition-based learning, TP248.13-248.65, Mathematics, Algorithms, Biotechnology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 44 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
