Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Surgical Results of Consecutive Exotropia

Authors: Hoosein Mughadasifar; Mohadeseh Feizi; Zhale Rajavi; Kourosh Sheibani; Narges Haftabadi; Mehdi Yaseri;

Surgical Results of Consecutive Exotropia

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the success rates of different surgical procedures and the risk factors of surgical failure among patients with consecutive exotropia. Methods: Forty patients with exotropia were observed at least 6 weeks after their esotropia surgery. Surgical planning was based on the medial rectus muscle function. Lateral rectus weakening in patients with normal medial rectus function, medial rectus strengthening for patients with limited medial rectus function (−1 to −3), and combined procedure occurred when the correction of each type of surgery was less than the amount of deviation. Postoperatively, patients were divided into success (8 prism diopters [PD] or less) or failure (8 PD or greater) groups. The follow-up period was at least 3 months. Results: The mean preoperative exotropia was 29 ± 13 PD, which was reduced to 7 ± 7 PD postoperatively ( P < .001). Successful results were achieved in 31 patients (77.5%), 17 (81%) in lateral rectus weakening, 10 (83%) in medial rectus strengthening, and 4 (57%) in the combined procedure group. More preoperative exodeviation was observed in the failure group compared to the success group ( P = .015).The mean dose response was 2.27 ± 0.92 PD/mm in the lateral rectus weakening, 4.25 ± 2.27 PD/mm in the medial rectus strengthening, and 2.31 ± 0.66 PD/mm in the combined procedure groups. Conclusion: If the choice of surgical planning is based on medial rectus function and the amount of exodeviation, satisfactory alignment would be achieved in the majority of patients with consecutive exotropia. The preoperative amount of exodeviation was the only risk factor of surgical failure in the study. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2013;50(5):274–281.]

Keywords

Adult, Male, Depth Perception, Adolescent, Visual Acuity, Infant, Gestational Age, Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Treatment Outcome, Oculomotor Muscles, Risk Factors, Child, Preschool, Exotropia, Humans, Female, Treatment Failure, Child

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    16
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
16
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?