Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao American Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Article . 1996 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus
Article . 1996 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Infantile Exotropia

Authors: A W, Biglan; J S, Davis; K P, Cheng; M C, Pettapiece;

Infantile Exotropia

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Exotropia is uncommon in healthy children between 6 months and 1 year old. Methods: The charts of patients treated in our practice between January 1980 and August 1994 were reviewed for a diagnosis of infantile exotropia. All of them had an exodeviation during the first year of life. Children with neurologic defects, prematurity, trauma, craniofacial syndromes, or orbital abnormalities or ocular defects that would reduce vision were eliminated. Results: Sixty-six healthy patients with normal eyes had an exodeviation of 15 prism diopters (?) or more that persisted through the first year of life. Fifty-four were eliminated because the diagnosis had not been confirmed by a pediatric ophthalmologist before they were 1 year old or they had not been followed for more than 4 years. The 12 remaining patients were followed for at least 4 years (mean, 7.9 years). The mean age at the first examination was 7.8 months (range, 4 to 12 months). On early evaluation, exotropia was intermittent in four and constant in eight. Three had amblyopia. Ten required surgical correction. Exotropia was corrected with one operation in six patients; four required additional procedures, mostly to correct oblique muscle overaction and dissociated vertical deviation (DVD). At the most recent visit, all 12 patients had equal visual acuity in both eyes and satisfactory ocular alignment. Five had fusion at distance and near, but only two had stereo acuity of 100 seconds of arc or better. Conclusion: Infantile exotropia is rare. But, like patients with infantile esotropia, those with exotropia can be expected to have good visual acuity but unstable ocular alignment. Also, as with early-onset esotropia, although surgical intervention is usually required, high levels of binocular function develop in some patients with exotropia. Oblique muscle overaction and DVD are common, often becoming manifest by the first year of age. Unlike infantile esotropia, nystagmus is rare.

Keywords

Reoperation, Depth Perception, Oculomotor Muscles, Visual Acuity, Exotropia, Humans, Infant

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    58
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
58
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!