Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Nursing Diagnosis Anyone? Do Staff Nurses Use Nursing Diagnosis Effectively?

Authors: Loyde W. Hales; C. Frances Johnson;

Nursing Diagnosis Anyone? Do Staff Nurses Use Nursing Diagnosis Effectively?

Abstract

ABSTRACT The use of nursing diagnosis by staff nurses in a 225-bed metropolitan hospital was examined. The sample consisted of 82 newly hired nurses who had participated in a mandated staff development program on nursing process theory and use of nursing diagnosis, with an emphasis on transfer of knowledge to practice. The data collected included demographic information, attitudes concerning nursing diagnosis, pretest and posttest scores, and percent completed on the audits of chart documentation. A cross-tabulation by clinical arena was performed on the forms used to document utilization of nursing diagnosis. Analysis of the data indicated that a greater proportion of the charts for the nurses in the maternal/child clinical arena evidenced use of nursing diagnosis as a component of practice. The nurses in the critical care arena scored slightly lower. The nurses in the medical/surgical arena had the lowest compliance of both completion and utilization of nursing diagnosis. This study demonstrated that nurses can be taught to use nursing diagnosis in the clinical setting.

Keywords

Adult, Inservice Training, Nursing Diagnosis, Attitude of Health Personnel, Middle Aged, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Nursing Education Research, Humans, Clinical Competence, Nursing Assessment, Demography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?