Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Revue internationale...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Revue internationale de droit économique
Article
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: UnpayWall
Revue internationale de droit économique
Article . 2015 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Le logiciel libre et les communs

Deux formes de résistance et d’alternative à l’exclusivisme propriétaire
Authors: Sébastien Broca; Benjamin Coriat;

Le logiciel libre et les communs

Abstract

Cet article porte sur les liens qui se sont tissés entre le mouvement du logiciel libre initié par Richard Stallman, les juristes anglo-saxons défendant le domaine public (Lawrence Lessig, James Boyle, Yochai Benkler, etc.) et les chercheurs réunis autour de l’économiste Elinor Ostrom. Il retrace l’histoire de la rencontre entre ces trois groupes d’acteurs au début des années 2000 et en dégage les enjeux : la construction d’une théorie des communs à même d’embrasser ressources physiques et contenus numériques ; le dépassement de certaines limites liées à l’hégémonie de la propriété exclusive. Nous analysons ces questions à travers une approche de la propriété comme faisceau de droits ( bundle of rights ) et en étudiant les exemples de la licence GPL et des licences Creative Commons.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    24
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
24
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
hybrid