
doi: 10.3905/jsf.12.4.41
Bond ratings are becoming confusing because rating agencies have adopted inconsistent rating definitions for different kinds of securities. Standard & Poor9s rating definitions illustrate the issue most vividly. S&P9s rating symbols correspond to different default probabilities for 1) corporate bonds, 2) mortgage and asset backed securities, and 3) collateralized bond obligations. At Moody9s, the rating scale for U.S. municipal bonds is calibrated to different levels of expected loss than is the rating scale for all other types of bonds. Inconsistent rating definitions undermine the comparability of bonds from different sectors of the fixed income markets. Moreover, regulations that rely on private credit ratings often presume that each rating agency9s rating definitions are constant across market sectors (and also constant over time). Inconsistent rating definitions contradict that presumption and cast doubt on the effectiveness of the regulations.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
