
Despite institutional investors9 growing interest in funds of hedge funds, little attention has been paid thus far to their added value and/or the sources of their added value. This is all the more striking in that funds of funds are far from transparent and are, with their double-fee structure, relatively costly investment vehicles. The authors9 objective, as explained in this article, is to fill this research gap and find out whether funds of funds add value through strategic allocation and active management. To this end, the authors ran a return-based style analysis on a sample of 97 funds of funds over the period from 1997 to 2004. The authors found that 89% of the funds of funds added value at the strategic allocation level, but only 31% added value at the active management level. Finally, only 20% of funds of funds created value through both strategic allocation and active management. In other words, if picking best performingfunds is a challenging task, picking best performing funds of funds appears to be equally difficult.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
