
This presentation focuses on innovative approaches and best practices for the scholarly publication of barcoding data, emphasizing the importance of data publishing in academic contexts. It introduces the core principles of scholarly data publishing, highlighting key concepts such as "findability," "accessibility," "interoperability," and "reusability of digital assets," all aligned with the FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable). The discussion outlines two primary methods for publishing data: through scholarly journals, where data is integrated with peer-reviewed articles, and via data aggregators like BOLD, GenBank, and GBIF. The significance of scholarly data publishing is underscored, noting benefits such as establishing priority for data collections, providing credit and recognition to researchers involved in data generation, enhancing metadata quality through peer review, and ensuring better data discoverability via DOIs and journal indexing. The processes for importing and exporting data, along with examples of successful workflows incorporating structured specimen records, are demonstrated. Additionally, the role of data papers as a mechanism for data publishing is explored, highlighting the potential for the automated conversion of metadata into manuscripts using tools like ARPHA. Barcode reference libraries (simple tables containing data about the relationships between taxa and their sequences) can also be published as standalone data papers. In conclusion, it is essential to publish your data (sequences, specimens, etc.) in data aggregators, associate these with scientific articles, and adhere to the FAIR principles while including relevant identifiers.
FAIR Principles, barcode reference libraries, Data Paper
FAIR Principles, barcode reference libraries, Data Paper
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
