Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ

Authors: A, Takeda; N, Shigematsu; M, Kondo; A, Amemiya; O, Kawaguchi; S, Kutsuki; R, Ishibashi; +4 Authors

Breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ

Abstract

This retrospective analysis evaluates the treatment results and prognostic factors of 114 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) undergoing breast conserving therapy (BCT) at Keio University Hospital Department of Radiology, between 1988 and 1997. A total of 132 patients with DCIS of the breast came to our hospital between 1988 and 1997, and 114 cases were suitable candidates for BCT. All of the patients were female and ranged in age from 26 to 81 years (median 46). Ninety-one patients were premenopausal, and 23 were postmenopausal. Median clinical tumor size was 2.0 cm (0-8.0 cm). Postoperatively 48 cases received 50 Gy/25 fractions of external irradiation to the whole breast via tangential ports. The follow-up period after treatment ranged from 11 to 162 months (median 46.7). The local relapse-free rate and overall survival rate of the 114 patients were 89.5% and 100%, respectively. Local failure and regional nodal failure occurred in 12 and 1 patient, respectively. Radiotherapy was a significant risk factor for local failure (p=0.05). No postmenopausal patients developed local failure, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.103). The 12 recurrent cases underwent additional surgery and all remain alive without recurrence, to date, i.e., at least 16 months. Breast-conserving surgery plus irradiation is appropriate treatment for DCIS patients.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Breast Neoplasms, Radiotherapy Dosage, Middle Aged, Mastectomy, Segmental, Prognosis, Combined Modality Therapy, Disease-Free Survival, Postmenopause, Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating, Premenopause, Humans, Female, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Neoplasm Staging, Proportional Hazards Models, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!