
This study describes the implementation of a 2‐D finite element model of an integral abutment bridge (IAB) system which explicitly incorporates the nonlinear soil response. The superstructure members have been represented by means of three‐node isoparametric beam elements with three degrees of freedom per node. The soil mass is idealized by eight node isoperimetric quadrilateral element at near field and five node isoparametric infinite element to simulate the far field behavior of the soil media. The non‐linearity of the soil mass has been represented by using the Duncan and Chang hyperbolic model. The applicability of this model was demonstrated by analyzing a single span IAB. This study has shown that the soil nonlinearity has significant effect on the response of the structure, where the displacement that have been obtained on basis of nonlinear analysis is 1.5–2.0 times higher than that obtained from linear analysis. The stress magnitudes in the nonlinear analysis are also higher where in some point the difference reached almost 3 times. Santrauka Straipsnyje aprašoma, kaip taikomas 2‐D baigtiniu elementu metodas tilto sistemai su integraliniais ramtais analizuoti, apimant ir netiesine grunto elgsena. Antžemines tilto dalies laikantieji elementai modeliuojami taikant triju mazgu izoparametrinius strypinius elementus su trimis laisves laipsniais kiekviename mazge. Grunto masyvui modeliuoti taikomi aštuoniu mazgu izoparametriniai ketursieniai elementai arti tilto esančioje aplinkoje ir penkiu mazgu izoparametriniai begaliniai elementai, imituojantys grunto terpes elgsena nuo tilto nutolusiose srityse. Grunto masyvo elgsenos netiesiškumas ivertinamas Duncan ir Chang hiperboliniu modeliu. Jo tinkamumas aiškinamas analizuojant vieno tarpatramio integralini tilta. Atlikti tyrimai parode, kad grunto savybiu netiesiškumas turi didele itaka tilto konstrukciju elgsenai. Tilto poslinkiai, nustatyti taikant netiesine analize, yra 1,5–2,0 karto didesni už poslinkius, nustatytus taikant tiesine analize. Atlikus netiesine analize nustatyti itempiai taip pat yra didesni, o kai kuriais atvejais skirtumas siekia beveik tris kartus.
Finite element method, Soil-Structure Interaction, Soil Mechanics in Geotechnical Engineering Practice, Seismic Design and Analysis of Underground Structures, Structural engineering, Geometry, finite element analysis, Node (physics), Mathematical analysis, Quantum mechanics, Engineering, soil structure interaction, nonlinear analysis, FOS: Mathematics, Civil and Structural Engineering, integral abutment bridge, Building construction, Physics, 621, Articles, Physical Sciences, Nonlinear system, Quadrilateral, TH1-9745, Mathematics, Mechanical Behavior of Soil Reinforcement Techniques
Finite element method, Soil-Structure Interaction, Soil Mechanics in Geotechnical Engineering Practice, Seismic Design and Analysis of Underground Structures, Structural engineering, Geometry, finite element analysis, Node (physics), Mathematical analysis, Quantum mechanics, Engineering, soil structure interaction, nonlinear analysis, FOS: Mathematics, Civil and Structural Engineering, integral abutment bridge, Building construction, Physics, 621, Articles, Physical Sciences, Nonlinear system, Quadrilateral, TH1-9745, Mathematics, Mechanical Behavior of Soil Reinforcement Techniques
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
