Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Clinical Breast Canc...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Clinical Breast Cancer
Article . 2006 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Disease-Specific Survival in Patient-Detected Breast Cancer

Authors: Henry G, Kaplan; Judith A, Malmgren;

Disease-Specific Survival in Patient-Detected Breast Cancer

Abstract

Patient-detected breast cancer is not well described, and its association with survival is not known.Initial breast cancer detection methods were extracted from patient chart notes in a registry cohort of women aged 40-93 with primary invasive breast cancer seen at the community-based regional cancer center between 1990 and 1999 (N = 2228). Patients were followed for vital status and recurrence (current as of 2003/2004) with a mean follow-up of 7.6 years. Physician-detected breast cancers were excluded from the analysis (n = 231).Forty-six percent of cases were patient detected (n = 1019), and 54% were mammography detected (n = 1209). Those with patient-detected disease received more aggressive treatment (combined radiation and chemotherapy; 49% vs. 23%; P < 0.001) and were twice as likely to have a modified radical mastectomy (41% vs. 20%; P < 0.001). Patient-detected cases were more likely to have a disease recurrence (5-year recurrence rate: 13% vs. 6%; log-rank test, 30.51; P < 0.001) and were more likely to die of disease (5-year disease-specific mortality rate: 8% vs. 3%; log-rank test, 34.7; P < 0.001). In a Cox proportional hazards model, detection method was not associated with risk of breast cancer-related death.Patient-detected breast cancer appears to be a more virulent form of breast cancer than mammography-detected breast cancer with higher recurrence and mortality risk despite more aggressive treatment.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Breast Self-Examination, Breast Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Disease-Free Survival, Cohort Studies, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Female, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Aged, Mammography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    11
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
11
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!