Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Clinical Breast Canc...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Clinical Breast Cancer
Article . 2002 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
Clinical Breast Cancer
Other literature type . 2003
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Era of Hope

Authors: George W, Sledge;
Abstract

The United States Army’s Breast Cancer Research Program recently celebrated its 10th anniversary of congressional funding in Orlando, Florida, with a meeting aptly titled Era of Hope. The meeting brought together clinicians, basic scientists, and breast cancer advocates who have been involved in the program, including both current and past recipients of the program’s awards. The 10th anniversary of such a program allows one to pause for a moment to consider the past decade and what it has meant for the breast cancer community. By any measure, it has been a momentous decade, both in terms of our understanding of the basic biology of the disease and in terms of the treatments available. As a little experiment, I researched when some of today’s commonly used terms first entered Medline with regard to breast cancer. The results, shown below, are fascinating and give us some sense of how far we have journeyed in the past decade. In addition, the past decade has seen the approval of numerous agents for the treatment of breast cancer by the US Food and Drug Administration. Prior to the past decade, there had been a long drought with regard to new agents in breast cancer since the approval of doxorubicin in the late 1970s. The past few years have seen the approval of new chemotherapeutic agents (eg, the taxanes and capecitabine), new hormonal agents (eg, the aromatase inhibitors and fulvestrant), and an entirely new class of agents (eg, the HERtargeting monoclonal antibody trastuzumab), as well as supportive care agents that prevent the complications of therapy (eg, antiemetics and hematopoietic growth factors) or of breast cancer (eg, bisphosphonates). Several of these agents not only entered our armamentarium for metastatic disease but have also completed phase III trials in the adjuvant setting. Have they also made a difference from a public health standpoint? I think so. The past decade is the first since we began collecting detailed mortality data to actually demonstrate a decline in the rate of breast cancer deaths (both in relative and absolute terms). This decline almost certainly came about as a result of one of two factors: early detection and surgery or curative therapy for microscopic metastatic disease. Not that we are anywhere near the day when we can call this battle won; far too many women still die of breast cancer, and breast cancer incidence (as opposed to mortality) continues to increase. But I do believe, given what we have seen and what I think we can expect, that this is indeed an era of hope.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Humans, Antineoplastic Agents, Breast Neoplasms, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!