Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Iraqi Journal for El...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Using Pearson Correlation and Mutual Information (PC-MI) to Select Features for Accurate Breast Cancer Diagnosis Based on a Soft Voting Classifier

Authors: Mohammed Hashim; Ali Yassin;

Using Pearson Correlation and Mutual Information (PC-MI) to Select Features for Accurate Breast Cancer Diagnosis Based on a Soft Voting Classifier

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the most critical diseases suffered by many people around the world, making it the most common medical risk they will face. This disease is considered the leading cause of death around the world, and early detection is difficult. In the field of healthcare, where early diagnosis based on machine learning (ML) helps save patients’ lives from the risks of diseases, better-performing diagnostic procedures are crucial. ML models have been used to improve the effectiveness of early diagnosis. In this paper, we proposed a new feature selection method that combines two filter methods, Pearson correlation and mutual information (PC-MI), to analyse the correlation amongst features and then select important features before passing them to a classification model. Our method is capable of early breast cancer prediction and depends on a soft voting classifier that combines a certain set of ML models (decision tree, logistic regression, and support vector machine) to produce one model that carries the strengths of the models that have been combined, yielding the best prediction accuracy. Our work is evaluated by using the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer datasets. The proposed methodology outperforms previous work, achieving 99.3% accuracy, an F1 score of 0.9922, a recall of 0.9846, a precision of 1, and an AUC of 0.9923. Furthermore, the accuracy of 10-fold cross-validation is 98.2%.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
gold