
doi: 10.3791/69534
pmid: 41460747
Epididymitis is a highly prevalent disease in the outpatient urologic clinic and a relevant factor in male infertility. Bacterial infections, including sexually transmitted bacteria and common uropathogens, represent the most common etiological factors of epididymitis. Nevertheless, the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the onset, natural history, and outcomes of bacterial epididymitis remain poorly understood. In this regard, rodent models are valuable tools for investigating the mechanistic responses of the epididymis when challenged with various inflammatory or infectious stimuli. Studies in rats and mice showed that bacterial-derived pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and lipoteichoic acid (LTA) from Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, respectively, trigger acute inflammation in the epididymis. The severity of these inflammatory responses differs according to the epididymal region affected and is associated with poor sperm parameters. Herein, two distinct surgical approaches are described in detail for inducing epididymitis in mice through the injection of PAMPs in the interstitial compartment of the initial segment or the luminal compartment of the vas deferens toward the cauda epididymidis, thus allowing investigation of the inflammatory responses of the epididymal proximal and distal regions. It is expected that these experimental models of epididymitis will enable future studies aimed at advancing the understanding of the mechanisms governing the epididymal responses to invading pathogens, opening novel ways for therapeutic interventions to mitigate the repercussions of epididymitis on male fertility.
Male, Epididymitis, Lipopolysaccharides, Epididymis, Teichoic Acids, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Disease Models, Animal, Animals
Male, Epididymitis, Lipopolysaccharides, Epididymis, Teichoic Acids, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Disease Models, Animal, Animals
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
