Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

UBM for MEMS, OEMS and CMOS

Authors: Donald Gudeczauskas;

UBM for MEMS, OEMS and CMOS

Abstract

ABSTRACT Under Bump Metallization (UBM) using Electroless Nickel / Immersion Gold (ENIG) is a low cost option for deposition of UBM layers. Unlike dry methods involving vacuum techniques, this technology uses wet processes and can offer economic and throughput advantages. Throughput advantages are realized by batch processing of several wafers at a time while processing in cassette trays. Use of a dedicated (usually automated) tool for ENIG deposition can yield throughput of up to several hundred wafers per shift depending on the tool size. The selectivity of the process allows for deposition of the ENIG only on the exposed aluminum or copper pads. Wafer manufacturers are continuously searching for various methods to increase throughput and decrease wafer processing costs. Of note, the final layer of many integrated circuit bond pads consists of aluminum or copper. Aluminum can serve as an acceptable surface for standard wire bonding since the wire bonding techniques form an acceptable wire bond through the tenacious oxide layer normally present on the aluminum surface, but this surface is not acceptable for soldering or conductivity. As a result, UBM methods are used in order to form a good bond to the aluminum pad and also help prevent diffusion of metals into the IC itself. Traditionally, dry methods are used to form the UBM (sputtering or vacuum deposition), but these methods require large capital cost for equipment and result in relatively low productivity. These methods are, however, industry accepted and dry metallization techniques are still used for the majority of wafers. Wet chemical methods such as ENIG have been investigated to serve as both a solderable surface for the bumps themselves and as a wire bondable surface while also increasing productivity. The standard processing sequence for ENIG as a UBM process for aluminum pads is shown in Figure 1.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!