
The building structure is the main component that supports the establishment of a building. In analyzing the building structure, either determinate or indeterminate, there are various moment distribution methods. The method used in this research is the Takabeya method and SAP 2000 as a comparison. The purpose of this study is to compare the value of the moment, shear force and axial force of the building structure with the Takabeya and SAP 2000 methods. From the results of the calculation of the internal forces on the first floor, the value is not significant. As for the 2nd floor, on the portal on the edge of the building there is a small difference in value, but not on the central portal which has a difference of up to 20%. From the overall calculation of internal forces, the ratio of moment values is ± 7%, shear force is ± 3%, and the axial force is ± 5%. The difference in internal force results between the Takabeya and SAP 2000 methods is not too large, it shows that the moment distribution for the two moments is almost the same. But for the results of the shear and axial forces which have very large differences in results, this difference is due to the possibility of load distribution at the joint points.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
