
This article presents a cognitive model that reconciles a surprising observation in the picture-word interference (PWI) paradigm with the general notion that PWI is a form of Stroop interference. Dell'Acqua, Job, Peressotti, and Pascali (2007) assessed PWI using a psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm, and concluded that the locus of interference in PWI is during the perceptual encoding stage. Stroop interference, on the other hand, is generally attributed to response selection. Based on these findings it was argued that PWI is not a Stroop effect. The present article discusses an alternative interpretation of these results. We assume that both effects are caused by the same interference mechanism, but that the processing speed associated with the different stimuli (colors vs. words) accounts for the previously reported differences. We support this argument by presenting a single computational model that accounts for both PWI and Stroop phenomena in single task and PRP settings.
RESPONSE-SELECTION, DUAL-TASK PERFORMANCE, SEMANTIC INTERFERENCE, STIMULUS-STIMULUS, Models, Psychological, EXECUTIVE COGNITIVE-PROCESSES, PROCESSING STAGES, Semantics, Conflict, Psychological, Discrimination, Psychological, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reading, COMPUTATIONAL THEORY, SPREADING-ACTIVATION THEORY, Stroop Test, Reaction Time, Humans, Attention, PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY-PERIOD, INTEGRATED THEORY
RESPONSE-SELECTION, DUAL-TASK PERFORMANCE, SEMANTIC INTERFERENCE, STIMULUS-STIMULUS, Models, Psychological, EXECUTIVE COGNITIVE-PROCESSES, PROCESSING STAGES, Semantics, Conflict, Psychological, Discrimination, Psychological, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reading, COMPUTATIONAL THEORY, SPREADING-ACTIVATION THEORY, Stroop Test, Reaction Time, Humans, Attention, PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY-PERIOD, INTEGRATED THEORY
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 69 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
