
doi: 10.3758/bf03342606
This study investigated the effects of recall rates (2:3-sec vs 2:5-sec vs 2:8-sec), length of between-trial intervals (none vs 10 sec vs 60 sec), and noun concreteness on paired-associate learning. Ss learned a list of concrete-concrete, concrete-abstract, abstract-concrete, and abstract-abstract nouns. The results indicated that concrete nouns, particularly on the stimulus side of pairs, facilitated recall. Intertrial intervals yielded no significant effect on recall. The failure to find significant differences attributable to recall rates was discussed in reference to a previous study which found differences in learning abstract and concrete noun stimuli as a function of duration of input or study intervals.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
