
doi: 10.3758/bf03208806
pmid: 3362664
We have found that a picture of a face is more easily detected than is a pattern of arbitrarily rearranged facial features. An upright face is also more detectable than an inverted face. Using two-alternative forced-choice visual masking paradigms, we have found that this face-detection effect (FDE) can be produced with line drawings and with photocopies of a picture of a face. Our results suggest that a face, as an organized, meaningful pattern, is a more potent stimulus than an arbitrary assemblage of the same visual features. It may be that the FDE is a visual configuration effect. Previous visual configuration effects have been documented only with recognition responses. The FDE, by contrast, documents a configuration effect that affects the detectability of a stimulus.
Form Perception, Cognition, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Face, Humans, Perceptual Masking, Semantics
Form Perception, Cognition, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Face, Humans, Perceptual Masking, Semantics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 117 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
