
doi: 10.3758/bf03207480
pmid: 3405734
This paper describes a series of visual search experiments for targets defined by their hinocular characteristics. In searches for targets defined by binocular rivalry among fused distractors, or vice versa, the rivalrous items do not "pop out" (reaction time [RT] increases with number of distractors). Binocular luster, a variety of rivalry, is an exception. Luster, an important property of visible surfaces, behaves like a basic feature or "texton" (RT independent of the number of nonlustrous distractors). Searches for targets defined exclusively by eye-of-origin information are virtually impossible. Subjects respond randomly, suggesting that purely monocular information is not available for visual search. Searches for cyclopean (but nonstereoscopic) features are easy, with RTs independent of set size, suggesting that some purely binocular information is available for visual search.
Form Perception, Depth Perception, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reaction Time, Humans, Attention, Dominance, Cerebral
Form Perception, Depth Perception, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reaction Time, Humans, Attention, Dominance, Cerebral
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 99 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
