
doi: 10.3758/bf03207169
pmid: 3831917
Sensitivity to phase quantization of a two-dimensional random texture pattern was investigated in central and peripheral vision, using the method of Caelli and Bevan (1982). The random texture was phase quantized with two-octave-wide bands centered on spatial frequencies of 2, 4, 8, and 16 cycles per degree (cpd). For each of these bands, six modified versions of the original texture were prepared using different degrees of phase quantization: 24 steps of 15°, 8 steps of 45°, 5 steps of 72°, 4 steps of 90°, 3 steps of 120°, and 2 steps of 180°. The task of the subject was to discriminate between the original texture and each of the six phase-distorted versions. The amount of stimulus contrast required for threshold discrimination of each stimulus pair was determined using a two-alternative, forced-choice paradigm combined with a maximum-likelihood staircase procedure. Stimuli were presented sequentially at exposure durations of 1,000 and 125 msec. Subjects viewed the stimuli with foveal vision or 2° in the right peripheral visual field. The results show that maximum sensitivity to phase quantization is found in the 4 cpd spatial frequency band and that sensitivity is greatly reduced with peripheral vision. Sensitivity to phase quantization is higher with 1,000- than with 125-msec exposure duration.
Adult, Form Perception, Male, Perceptual Distortion, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Humans, Visual Fields, Retina
Adult, Form Perception, Male, Perceptual Distortion, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Humans, Visual Fields, Retina
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
