
doi: 10.3758/bf03206340
pmid: 6739271
This paper describes the results of three experiments on the global precedence effect, using stimuli derived from the receptive field characteristics of neurons in the visual cortex. Thus, the local cue consists of oriented line segments whose sizes correspond to the average size of the central portion of receptive fields in parafoveal representations of the macaque primary visual cortex. The global cue comprises these line segments distributed within larger rectangular clusters. The first experiment showed that global precedence is obtained when the relative visibility of the local and global cues is specifically evaluated and found to be comparable. In the second experiment, variants of the Garner sorting task produced results indicating that global processing is largely independent of local cues, but that local processing depends heavily on the status of task-irrelevant global cues. These asymmetric interactions are consistent with the notion of a priority for processing global cues. The third experiment demonstrated that the magnitude of global precedence is inversely related to pattern luminance. This latter finding is interpreted, in the context of Sternberg’s additive factors logic (1969), as indicating that this priority for global feature processing is at least partially attributable to aspects of early visual processes.
Discrimination Learning, Form Perception, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychophysics, Humans, Cues
Discrimination Learning, Form Perception, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychophysics, Humans, Cues
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 83 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
