Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

ACCEPTABILITY OF ANTENATAL SCREENING FOR DEPRESSION IN ROUTINE ANTENATAL CARE

Authors: Bronwyn, Leigh; Jeannette, Milgrom;

ACCEPTABILITY OF ANTENATAL SCREENING FOR DEPRESSION IN ROUTINE ANTENATAL CARE

Abstract

Objective: The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is generally recognised as a valid, reliable, cost-effective and simple tool to implement within routine care, however there is controversy regarding the acceptability of screening for depression. This paper aims to examine how acceptable women find (1) completing a battery of questionnaires, including the EPDS and (2) receiving feedback from midwives regarding the significance of their EPDS score when being screened for depression as part of routine antenatal care. Design: Telephone interviews with women following completion of the questionnaire battery and receiving feedback from midwives. Setting: Antenatal primary care in a hospital setting. Subjects: Community sample of 407 women screened by midwives in antenatal clinics. Main outcome measures: Information regarding women’s experience of participating in the screening process. Results: 100% of women reported that the screening experience was acceptable and not upsetting. Almost 50% reported that the screening process raised their awareness of perinatal depression. No woman reported feeling stigmatised, labelled or distressed by the screening process. Women reported that gaining immediate feedback from midwives was reassuring. Conclusion: This study strongly supports the acceptability of routine screening for perinatal depression in the context of registered midwife support.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Depression, Postpartum, Adolescent, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Mass Screening, Female, Queensland, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    43
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
43
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!