Optimal Packings of 13 and 46 Unit Squares in a Square
Copyright policy ) Wolfram Bentz;
Optimal Packings of 13 and 46 Unit Squares in a Square
Let $s(n)$ be the side length of the smallest square into which $n$ non-overlapping unit squares can be packed. We show that $s(m^2-3)=m$ for $m=4,7$, implying that the most efficient packings of 13 and 46 squares are the trivial ones.
Packing and covering in \(2\) dimensions (aspects of discrete geometry), Combinatorial aspects of packing and covering
Packing and covering in \(2\) dimensions (aspects of discrete geometry), Combinatorial aspects of packing and covering
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).2 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
selected citations
Citations provided by BIP!
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
Citations provided by BIP!popularityPopularity provided by BIP!
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
Popularity provided by BIP! 2
Average
Average
Average
gold
Fields of Science (4) View all