Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Jurnal Metabioarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Jurnal Metabio
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

EFEKTIVITAS LITERASI SAINS PADA PEMBELAJARAN BIOLOGI

Authors: null Wahdiyana; null Vita; null Yatin Mulyono;

EFEKTIVITAS LITERASI SAINS PADA PEMBELAJARAN BIOLOGI

Abstract

The development of science and technology in the 21st century requires biology learning to not only focus on mastering concepts, but also on strengthening students' scientific literacy. Scientific literacy includes critical and analytical thinking skills, as well as the ability to evaluate and apply scientific information in real life. However, survey results such as PISA show that Indonesian students' scientific literacy is still relatively low, which is thought to be caused by a learning approach that is less contextual and minimally encourages active student involvement. One approach that is believed to be able to develop scientific literacy is the inquiry learning model. This study uses a meta-analysis method on eight SINTA-indexed scientific articles that examine the effectiveness of the inquiry learning model on students' critical thinking skills. The analysis was carried out by calculating the effect size value using the Cohen's d formula. The results show an average effect size value of -2.40, which statistically indicates a negative effect. However, there are extreme values ​​that significantly affect the aggregate results.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid